 |
 |
|
|
Read
 Assessed
Commented
|
|
| 1 Production of an itimised bill may not ... :: 2930 |
| 2 Burden of proof distribution for correc ... :: 1579 |
| 3 No content control of the clauses in ca ... :: 1475 |
| 1 Production of an itimised bill may not ... |
| 2 No content control of the clauses in ca ... |
| 3 Burden of proof distribution for correc ... |
Judgement of LG Berlin (Regional Court Berlin) of 02/07/2003, file number: 26 O 78/03
The regional court Berlin has decided about the customer requests for an itimised bill, although he has not done this before the decisive accounting period, that, this itemisation of the connecting dates cannot be dependent to a previous payment of the remuneration, according to §16 TKV (Telecommunication Act).
Judgement of BGH (Federal Supreme Court) of 24/05/2007, file number: III ZR 467/04
The clauses which are a component of one of the regulation authority for telecommunications and post (now federal net agency) of authorised collective pay structures for the granting of a net access are not defeated by the content control after §§9 to 11 AGBG – General Terms and Conditions Act (now §§307 to 309 BGB – German Civil Code); continuation of the senate judgement of July 2nd, 1998 - III ZR 287/97.
Judgement of OLG Koblenz (HRC Koblenz) of 05/04/2007, file number: 2 U 42705
The subscriber network operator has no original entitlement to remuneration for the added value services from a customer who dialled a 0190 number...
